Archive for the ‘Cat6’ Category

Category 6 Connecting Hardware Questions – What will happen if I mix and match different manufacturers’ hardware together?

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

If the components are category 6 compliant, then you will be assured of category 6 performance.

Category 6 Connecting Hardware Questions – Are the connectors for category 5e and category 6 different? Why are they more expensive?

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

Although category 6 and category 5e connectors> may look alike, category 6 connectors have much better transmission performance. For example, at 100 MHz, NEXT of a category 5e connector is 43 decibels (dB), while NEXT of a category 6 connector is 54 dB. This means that a cat6 connector couples about 1/12 of the power that a cat5e connector couples from one pair to another pair. Conversely, one can say that a category 6 connector is 12 times less “noisy” compared to a category 5e connector. This vast improvement in performance was achieved with new technology, new processes, better materials and significant R&D resources, leading to higher costs for manufacturers.

Category 6 Testing Questions – Would you get passing test results if you used a link adapter not recommended by a manufacturer?

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

You should expect to get passing results if both the link adapter interface and the mating jack that is part of the link are both compliant to category 6 requirements.

Category 6 Testing Questions – Why do field tester manufacturers offer many different link adapters if everyone meets the standard?

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

This was an interim solution while the standard was still being developed and the interoperability requirements were not yet established. It is likely that soon one or more adapters will work for testing of cabling from all vendors.

Category 6 Patch Cord Questions – Do you have to use the manufacturer’s patch cords to get category 6 performance?

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

 The category 6 standard has specifications for patch cords and connectors that are intended to assure interoperable category 6 performance. If manufacturers can demonstrate that each component meets the requirements in the standard, minimum category 6 performance will be achieved. However, manufacturers may also design their products to perform better than the minimum category 6 requirements, and in these cases compatible patch cords and connectors may lead to performance above the minimum category 6 requirements.

Category 6 Patch Cord Questions – Will contractors be able to make their own patch cords?

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

Category 6 patch cords are precision products, just like the cables and the connectors. They are best manufactured and tested in a controlled environment to ensure consistent, reliable performance. This will ensure interoperability and backward compatibility. All this supports patch cords as a factory-assembled product rather than a field-assembled product.

Is there a limitation on the size of bundles one can have with category 6? Can you have 200-300 and still pass category 6?

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

There is no limit imposed by the standards on the maximum number of category 6 cables in a bundle. This is a matter for the market and the industry to determine based on practical considerations. It should be pointed out that after six or eight cables, the performance in any cable will not change significantly since the cables will be too far away to add any additional external (or alien) NEXT.

Why did all category 6 cable used to have a spline, and now is offered without one?

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

Some category 6 cable designs have a spline to increase the separation between pairs and also to maintain the pair geometry. This additional separation improves NEXT performance and allows category 6 compliance to be achieved. With advances in technology, manufacturers have found other ways of meeting category 6 requirements. The bottom line is the internal construction of the cable does not matter, so long as it meets all the transmission and physical requirements of category 6. The standard does not dictate any particular method of cable construction.

What is the difference between enhanced category 5e cable rated for 400 MHz and category 6 cable rated for 250 MHz?

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

What is the difference between enhanced category 5e cable rated for 400 MHz and category 6 cable rated for 250 MHz?Category 5e requirements are specified up to 100 MHz. Cables can be tested up to any frequency that is supported by the test equipment, but such measurements are meaningless without the context of applications and cabling standards. The category 6 standard sets minimum requirements up to 250 MHz for cables, connecting hardware, patch cords, channels and permanent links, and therefore guarantees reasonable performance that can be utilized by applications.

Cat5e and Cat6 Comparision

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

Why do I need all the bandwidth of category 6? As far as I know, there is no application today that requires 200 MHz of bandwidth.

Bandwidth precedes data rates just as highways come before traffic. Doubling the bandwidth is like adding twice the number of lanes on a highway. The trends of the past and the predictions for the future indicate that data rates have been doubling every 18 months. Current applications running at 1 Gb/s are really pushing the limits of category 5e cabling. As streaming media applications such as video and multi-media become commonplace, the demands for faster data rates will increase and spawn new applications that will benefit from the higher bandwidth offered by category 6. This is exactly what happened in the early 90’s when the higher bandwidth of category 5 cabling compared to category 3 caused most LAN applications to choose the better media to allow simpler, cost effective, higher speed LAN applications, such as 100BASE-TX. Note: Bandwidth is defined as the highest frequency up to which positive power sum ACR (Attenuation to Crosstalk Ratio) is greater than zero.

What is the general difference between category 5e and category 6?

The general difference between category 5e and category 6 is in the transmission performance, and extension of the available bandwidth from 100 MHz for category 5e to 200 MHz for category 6. This includes better insertion loss, near end crosstalk (NEXT), return loss, and equal level far end crosstalk (ELFEXT). These improvements provide a higher signal-to-noise ratio, allowing higher reliability for current applications and higher data rates for future applications.

Will category 6 supersede category 5e?

Yes, analyst predictions and independent polls indicate that 80 to 90 percent of all new installations will be cabled with category 6. The fact that category 6 link and channel requirements are backward compatible to category 5e makes it very easy for customers to choose category 6 and supersede category 5e in their networks. Applications that worked over category 5e will work over category 6.

What does category 6 do for my current network vs. category 5e?

Because of its improved transmission performance and superior immunity from external noise, systems operating over category 6 cabling will have fewer errors vs. category 5e for current applications. This means fewer re-transmissions of lost or corrupted data packets under certain conditions, which translates into higher reliability for category 6 networks compared to category 5e networks.

When should I recommend or install category 6 vs. category 5e?

From a future proofing perspective, it is always better to install the best cabling available. This is because it is so difficult to replace cabling inside walls, in ducts under floors and other difficult places to access. The rationale is that cabling will last at least 10 years and will support at least four to five generations of equipment during that time. If future equipment running at much higher data rates requires better cabling, it will be very expensive to pull out category 5e cabling at a later time to install category 6 cabling. So why not do it for a premium of about 20 percent over category 5e on an installed basis?

What is the shortest link that the standard will allow?

There is no short length limit. The standard is intended to work for all lengths up to 100 meters. There is a guideline in ANSI/TIA/EIA-568-B.1 that says the consolidation point should be located at least 15 meters away from the telecommunications room to reduce the effect of connectors in close proximity. This recommendation is based upon worst-case performance calculations for short links with four mated connections in the channel.

What is a “tuned” system between cable and hardware? Is this really needed if product meets the standard?

The word “tuned” has been used by several manufacturers to describe products that deliver headroom to the category 6 standard. This is outside the scope of the category 6 standard. The component requirements of the standard have been carefully designed and analyzed to assure channel compliance and electrical/ mechanical interoperability.

What is impedance matching between cable and hardware? Is this really needed if product meets the standard?

The standard has no impedance matching requirements. These are addressed by having return loss requirements for cables, connectors, and patch cords.

Is there a use for category 6 in the residential market?

Yes, category 6 will be very effective in the residential market to support higher Internet access speeds while facilitating the more stringent Class B EMC requirements (see also the entire FCC Rules and Regulations, Title 47, Part 15). The better balance of category 6 will make it easier to meet the residential EMC requirements compared to category 5e cabling. Also, the growth of streaming media applications to the home will increase the need for higher data rates which are supported more easily and efficiently by category 6 cabling.

Why wouldn’t I skip category 6 and go straight to optical fiber?

You can certainly do that but will find that a fiber system is still very expensive. Ultimately, economics drive customer decisions, and today optical fiber together with optical transceivers is about twice as expensive as an equivalent system built using category 6 and associated copper electronics. Installation of copper cabling is more craft-friendly and can be accomplished with simple tools and techniques. Additionally, copper cabling supports the emerging Data Terminal Equipment (DTE) power standard under development by IEEE (802.3af).

What is meant by the term “Electrically Balanced”?

A simple open wire circuit consisting of two wires is considered to be a uniform, balanced transmission line. A uniform transmission line is one which has substantially identical electrical properties throughout its length, while a balanced transmission line is one whose two conductors are electrically alike and symmetrical with respect to ground and other nearby conductors.* “Electrically balanced” relates to the physical geometry and the dielectric properties of a twisted pair of conductors. If two insulated conductors are physically identical to one another in diameter, concentricity, dielectric material and are uniformly twisted with equal length of conductor, then the pair is electrically balanced with respect to its surroundings. The degree of electrical balance depends on the design and manufacturing process. Category 6 cable requires a greater degree of precision in the manufacturing process. Likewise, a category 6 connector requires a more balanced circuit design. For balanced transmission, an equal voltage of opposite polarity is applied on each conductor of a pair. The electromagnetic fields created by one conductor cancel out the electromagnetic fields created by its “balanced” companion conductor, leading to very little radiation from the balanced twisted pair transmission line. The same concept applies to external noise that is induced on each conductor of a twisted pair. A noise signal from an external source, such as radiation from a radio transmitter antenna generates an equal voltage of the same polarity, or “common mode voltage,” on each conductor of a pair. The difference in voltage between conductors of a pair from this radiated signal, the “differential voltage,” is effectively zero. Since the desired signal on the pair is the differential signal, the interference does not affect balanced transmission. The degree of electrical balance is determined by measuring the “differential voltage” and comparing it to the “common mode voltage” expressed in decibels (dB). This measurement is called Longitudinal Conversion Loss “LCL” in the Category 6 standard. * The ABC’s of the telephone Vol. 7

10 Gigabit Ethernet Cabling

Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

Introduction
Born in the 1970s, Ethernet technology has continually evolved in order to meet the ever-ending requirement for faster rates of data transmission. Through this ongoing volution, it has matured into the foremost technology standard for local area networks LANs) as newer, higher performing iterations – such as 10 Gigabit Ethernet (10GbE) –become more commonplace.

The demand for faster application speeds has also spurred technological evolution on data carrying techniques. As such, copper and fiber transmission standards have progressed, providing greater bandwidth for transporting data over Ethernet architectures with reduced cost and complexity.

There are various Ethernet standards and data carrying techniques, with particular emphasis on the utilization of existing fiber and copper cabling technologies for 10GbE LAN use.

Why 10 Gigabit Today?
Most LAN infrastructures employ a mixture of copper and fiber premises wiring. Many companies have legacy fiber connectivity for backbone links with copper wiring in place for wiring closets. These legacy backbones are generally sufficient as long as there are no demands for greater network performance or application bandwidth. However, as companies grow their networks and support new applications and traffic types, they are increasingly migrating to gigabit links. With gigabit connectivity widely available for gigabit-based PCs, servers, data center storage and high-end computing, gigabit technology is emerging as the connection of choice for many organizations.

So why is there a need for ten times gigabit performance, or 10GbE, today?
More for Less
In the past, 10GbE was neither necessary nor affordable. As with most burgeoning technologies, those dynamics are changing. Technological advancements have resulted in higher performance at lower costs. As such, gigabit and 10GbE bandwidth has become affordable for most companies. Regardless of cost, there is also a distinct need. An increasing number of applications require considerable bandwidth to support the transfer and streaming of large data, video and audio files. As bandwidth-intensive applications and latency sensitive traffic types become ubiquitous, so does the need to support and transport them.
In addition, many companies are seeking to “future proof” their network to ensure they can support emerging technologies and preserve their initial investments. In the past, fiber and wire cabling systems wereinstalled with a 10-year lifespan in mind. However, with the rapid, ongoing evolution of network technologies, companies must be concerned with their current infrastructure’s ability to keep pace.
Costs associated with re-cabling a network can be exorbitant and organizations should take precautions to ensure their cabling systems can last well into the future. 10GbE provides the very best assurance for being able to support forthcoming technologies and delivers utmost investment protection.

Data Centers
For many institutions – especially those that utilize automated trading – uptime and response time is critical. Delays longer than a second can be exceedingly costly. With servers now being able to transmit near gigabit bandwidth and network downtime proving catastrophic, today’s enterprise data centers need extended bandwidth. 10GbE is an ideal technology to move large amounts of data quickly. The bandwidth it provides in conjunction with server consolidation is highly advantageous for Web caching, real-time application response, parallel processing and storage.

Main building Backbone Links
Many organizations wish to connect their main buildings with high-speed links. Carrier-based services offload the burden of establishing and maintaining a 10GbE backbone, but limit flexibility and oftentimes prove too costly with expensive, unending monthly bills. This ongoing expense can be overwhelming for educational institutions, government organizations and hospitals as well as enterprises that do not have a set budget year to year. Establishing a 10GbE building backbone is a one-time expense that can provide significant cost savings when compared to monthly communications link bills.

Metro Area Transmission
Many companies also need to send and receive data beyond their main buildings, oftentimes in the form of large or streaming files that require high-speed links. Traditionally an area for carriers, 10GbE now offers an attractive alternative to costly monthly charges for long distance data transmission. Many carriers offer expensive transmission services utilizing SONET OC-48 or OC-192c standards. These are considered “lit” services where a company has to add protocol conversion to be able to link from end to end. Conversely, “un-lit” fiber – called Dark Fiber – is now being offered by carriers to companies able to provide their own connectivity. In these cases, routing switches supporting the 10GbE standard can provide their own transmission.

Taking advantage of 10GbE performance in tandem with carriers’ Dark Fiber services can drastically reduce costs when compared to “lit” transmission services.

Copper versus Fiber
Once the decision is made to implement 10GbE functionality, organizations must consider the data carrying techniques that facilitate such bandwidth. Copper and fiber cabling are the preeminent technologies for data transmission and provide their own unique benefits and drawbacks.

Copper is the de-facto standard for transmitting data between devices due to its low cost, easy installation and flexibility. It also possesses distinct shortcomings. Copper is best when utilized in short lengths, typically 100 meters or less. When employed over long distances, electromagnetic signal characteristics hinder performance. In addition, bundling copper cabling can cause interference, making it difficult to employ as a comprehensive backbone. For these reasons, copper cabling has become the principal data carrying technique for communication among PCs and LANs, but not main buildings or long-distance transmission.
On the other hand, fiber cabling is typically used for remote building connectivity, crowded wiring closets, long-distance communications and environments that need protection from interference, such as manufacturing areas. Since it is very reliable and less susceptible to attenuation, it is optimum for sending data beyond 100 meters. However, fiber is also more costly than copper and its use is typically limited to those applications that demand it. As a result, most organizations utilize a combination of copper and fiber cabling. As these companies transition to 10GbE functionality, they must have a solid understanding of the various cabling technologies and a sound migration strategy to ensure their cabling infrastructure will support their network infrastructure both today and tomorrow.

The Evolution of Cabling Technologies
Just as gigabit and 10GbE technologies have changed, so have the cabling technologies that support them. In fact, evolutions of cabling technologies have walked in-step with, and been largely driven by, evolutions to gigabit and 10GbE standards. Both IEEE802.3 standards and the associated cabling technologies have assumed many forms in order to optimize a variety of environments.

A grasp of the particular gigabit or 10GbE standard being employed is just as important as an understanding of the circumstance and environment – factoring distance of data transmission, equipment being utilized and budget – in order to determine what cabling strategy best suits a particular organization. Just as the difference between sending data 100 meters and 100 kilometers affects the optimum cabling strategy, so does the difference between sending data with IEEE802.3ae and IEEE802.3ak standards.

The 10GbE standards outlined below help define and optimize the environment in which they operate and the cabling technologies over which they communicate.

IEEE802.3ae
Ratified in June 2002, the IEEE802.3ae LAN standard was developed to update the preexisting IEEE802.3 standard for 10GbE fiber transmission. With the new standard, seven new media types were defined for LAN, metropolitan area network (MAN) and wide area network (WAN) connectivity:

10GBASE-SR – uses the lowest cost optics (850nm) to support 10GbE transmission over standard multimode fiber for distances of 33 and 86 meters. The SR standard also supports up to 300 meters using the new 2000MHz/km multimode fiber (laser optimized). SR is the lowest-cost optics of all defined 10GbE optics.

10GBASE-LR – uses higher cost optics (1310nm) than SR and requires more complex alignment of the optics to support single-mode fiber up to 10 km.

10GBASE-LX4 – supports traditional FDDI grade multimode fiber for distances up to 300 meters using Coarse Wavelength Division Multiplexing (CWDM), which lowers the transmission rate of each wavelength to 3.125Gbaud. The LX4 standard also supports single-mode fiber for up to 10 Km. LX4 is more expensive than both SR and LR because it requires four times the optical and electrical circuitry in addition to optical multiplexers. Over time, the quantity of components required to implement the technology may limit its ability to fit into smaller form factors.

10GBASE-ER – uses the most expensive optics (1550nm) to support single-mode fiber up to 30 km. For 40km, the fiber-optic connection must be an engineered link.

10GBASE-LRM – In the process of being ratified by IEEE. Using a technology called EDC (Electronic Dispersion Compensation), 10GBASE-LRM can provide a long distance solution based on multimode fiber and operates with a single wavelength.

10GBASE-SW, 10GBASE-LW, 10GBASE-EW – defined for use with a WAN PHY. These standards were defined to operate at the same baud rate as OC-192/STM-64 SONET/SDH equipment. They are the equivalent of the SR, LR and ER standards and support the same fiber cabling. LX4 does not have an equivalent WAN PHY standard.


IEEE802.3ak / 10GBASE-CX4

Approved in February 2004, 10GBASE-CX4 is a low-cost 10GbE solution intended for copper cabling with short distance connectivity that makes it ideal for wiring closet and data center connectivity. The first 10GbE copper cabling standard, 10GBASE-CX4 provides immediate advantages with its affordability and wide availability.
The CX4 standard transmits 10GbE over four channels using twin-axial cables. The cables were derived from Infiniband™ connectors and cable, but the CX4 standards committee defined the cables to be tighter in electrical specifications. Therefore, longer length (>10m) Infiniband cables will not necessarily work for CX4 applications and it is recommended to use only cables that are designed to meet IEEE 802.3ak specifications when using CX4. Another aspect of the CX4 cable is the rigidity and thickness of the cable. The longer the length used the thicker the cable. CX4 cables start at 30 American Wire Gauge (AWG) for short lengths to 24 AWG thickness for a full 15 meters. CX4 cables must also be factory terminated to meet defined specifications so they should be ordered to length.

IEEE802.3an / 10GBASE-T

Proposed in November 2002, 10GBASE-T is the latest proposed 10GbE standard for use with unshielded twisted-pair (UTP) style cabling. The goal of this copper standard, which is expected to be ratified in the year 2006, is to approximate RJ-45 connectivity of 100 meters. It is intended to improve the performance and distance of copper cabling at a cost that is lower or similar to fiber.

Category 5 (Cat 5) and Category 6 (Cat 6) are the most common cabling systems being installed today, but Cat 5 is not capable of meeting the bandwidth and crosstalk demands of 10GbE’s higher transmission speeds. In a large percentage of installations, cabling will have to be modified to support it. To meet the needs of 10GbE, a Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) subcommittee for cabling specifications
is working to provide additional specifications that will help vendors create sufficient cabling.

The cabling standard is Category 6A (Cat 6A), designed with existing Cat 6 cable but measured and specified to higher frequencies. In addition to Cat 6A, 10GBASE-T will operate on Category 7 (Cat 7) cables.

Optical Media Converters

Optical media converters have traditionally been used in converting Ethernet LAN copper transmission to Fiber-optic cabling for the express purpose of extending the copper distance past 100 meters. More of an implementation tactic than cabling standard, optical media converters provide a way to utilize existing copper and support low-cost fiber transmission. In many cases, fiber can extend 100Mb transmission over 100 kilometers and 1000Mb transmission up to 70 kilometers. To extend the current distance limitation of 15 meters for 10GBASE-CX4, products have been introduced for a 10GbE optical media converter to extend the supported distance up to 300 meters. These converters snap directly to the CX4 port and receive power through the CX4 connector to ease implementation for customers. The fiber cable used is 12-fiber 62.5 μm or 50 μm Multimode ribbon cable terminated by standard Multiple Terminations Push-Pull Latch (MTP™) connectors in a simple crossover configuration. These cables are generically known as Multi-fiber Push On or MPO cables.

Optical Media Converters can now provide much higher flexibility and 10GBASE-SR distance at half the price using a 10GBASE-CX4 switch port.

IT professionals must also consider the devices that connect their cabling to their network. Transceivers provide the interface between the equipment sending and receiving data and the cabling transporting it. Just as there are distinct cabling technologies that coincide with distinct gigabit technologies, various transceivers are also available to match each gigabit standard. Both gigabit and 10GbE technologies have “pluggable” transceivers. For gigabit technology, there are two defined transceiver types: Gigabit Interface Connector (GBIC) with its large metal case for insertion into low-density interface modules and units (switches), and the newer “mini-GBIC” or Small Form Factor Pluggable (SFP).
10GbE has four defined transceiver types. These transceivers are the result of Multi-Source Agreements (MSAs) that enable vendors to produce 802.3ae-compliant pluggable transceivers. The four types are:

XENPAK – the first 10GbE pluggable transceivers on the market to support the 802.3ae standard transmission optics. They are large, bulky and used mainly in LAN switches. These transceivers are “hot pluggable” and support the new 802.3ak Copper standard with vendors now producing transceivers to connect CX4 cables.

XPAK – used primarily in Network Interface Cards (NIC) and Host Bus Adapter (HBA) markets for use in Servers and NAS devices.

X2 – the smaller brother of the XENPAK pluggable transceivers, the X2 form factor is about 2/3 the size of the XENPAK. With the same “hot pluggable” specifications and supporting all the 10GbE standards (including copper), the X2 form factor allows for more port density on switches. X2 is being used by ProCurve and Cisco thereby providing customers with a strong sense of assurance that this technology
is the best choice for today and will have strong vendor support.

XFP – the newest pluggable transceiver on the market, XFP is the closest in size to the SFP pluggable transceiver now used for gigabit technology. Because it relies on a high-speed interface (10.3125Gbps), high-priced serializer/deserializer (SERDES) are required inside the switch to support it. Over time, the cost of such SERDES will decline, but today they add an unacceptable cost to the base system. Still, the
positive aspect of the XFP form factor is it will allow switch vendors to increase port density in a smaller area for cost savings. A drawback of the XFP will be its inability to support the current Copper (802.3ak) or the 10GBASE-LX4 standards.

SFP+ – As the industry brings down the cost and power of 10G optical devices, effort to increase the capacity of the existing SFP is being considered. For many customers, the possibility of achieving 10G speeds and a mechanical form factor that allows 1G or 10G to reside in the same footprint, might prove attractive.

Summary
As organizations grow their networks and support bandwidth-intensive applications and traffic types, 10GbE technology is becoming evermore pervasive. 10GbE functionality can provide immediate performance benefits and safeguard a company’s investment well into the future.

Just as there are many manifestations of the gigabit and 10GbE standards to suit various networking environments, there are also many copper and fiber cabling technologies to support them. Companies must have a solid understanding of not only their environment and need, but also the different standards and cabling technologies available to them. Doing so will help them develop a sound migration and cabling
strategy, enabling them to reap the benefits of 10GbE for years to come.

Category 5, 5e, and 6 copper wiring standards

Saturday, November 14th, 2009

Category 5, 5e, and 6 copper wiring standards

The news on bandwidth
The need for increased bandwidth never ceases—the more you have, the more you need. Applications keep getting more complex, and files keep getting bulkier. It won’t be long before you need to increase the speed of your network.

Because unshielded twisted-pair UTP cable is by far the most common networking cable, let’s take a brief look at where UTP is headed.

The limits of Category 5
Category 5 (CAT5) cabling is good, solid cable for 100-Mbps LANs. The Category 5 standard has been around since 1991, so it’s well established. You’ll find existing Category 5 installations everywhere. What can Category 5 cable do, and what can’t it do?

If you still have a lot of 10-Mbps equipment, CAT5 cabling will serve your needs. It also handles 100-Mbps Fast Ethernet transmissions very well.

But if you’re running up against the performance limits of a 100-Mbps network, you’ll probably want to upgrade at least parts of your system fairly soon to Category 5e (CAT5e) or higher.

Category 5e: the improved Category 5
Category 5e, also known as Enhanced Category 5, or CAT5e, was ratified in 1999. It’s an incremental improvement designed to enable cabling to support full-duplex Fast Ethernet operation and Gigabit Ethernet.

The main differences between CAT5 and CAT5e can be found in the specifications. The performance requirements have been raised slightly in the new standard.

CAT5e has stricter specifications for Power Sum Equal-Level Far-End Crosstalk (PS-ELFEXT), Near-End Crosstalk (NEXT), Attenuation, and Return Loss (RL) than those for CAT5. Like CAT5, CAT5e is a 100-MHz standard, but it has the capacity to handle bandwidth superior to that of CAT5. With these improvements, you can expect problem-free, full-duplex, 4-pair Ethernet transmissions over your CAT5e UTP.

Category 6
The next level in the cabling hierarchy is Category 6 (CAT6) (ANSI/TIA/EIA-568-B.2-1), which was ratified by the TIA/EIA in June 2002. CAT6 provides higher performance than CAT5e and features more stringent specifications for crosstalk and system noise.

The quality of the data transmission depends upon the performance of all the components of the channel. So to transmit according to CAT6 specs, the jacks, patch cables, patch panels, cross-connects, and cabling must all meet CAT6 standards. (The channel includes everything from the wallplate to the wiring closet.) The CAT6 components are tested individually, and they are also tested together for performance. In addition, the standard calls for generic system performance so that CAT6 components from any vendor can be used in the channel.

CAT6 channel transmission requirements should result in a Power-Sum Attenuation-to-Crosstalk Ratio (PS-ACR) that’s greater than or equal to zero at 200 MHz.

In addition, all CAT6 components must be backward compatible with CAT5e, CAT5, and CAT3. If different category components are used with CAT6 components, then the channel will achieve the transmission performance of the lower category. For instance, if CAT6 cable is used with CAT5e jacks, the channel will perform at a CAT5e level.

Industry standards
The advantage of sticking to the industry standards is the knowledge that your cabling will be compatible with standards applications. But the standards are always being improved upon, and it takes time to ratify a new standard. Often, as with CAT6, the final standard may be different from the proposed standard.

Twisted-Pair Cable Specifications Comparison
CAT5 CAT5e CAT6 CAT6a
(Proposed)
CAT7
Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz 250 MHz 500 MHz 600 MHz
Attenuation
(max. at 100MHz)
22.0 dB 22.0 dB 21.3 dB 19.1 dB 18.5 dB
Characteristic Impedance 100 ohms
± 15%
100 ohms
± 15%
100 ohms
± 15%
100 ohms
± 15%
100 ohms
± 15%
NEXT
(max. at 100MHz)
-32.3 dB -35.3 dB -39.9 dB -45.3 dB -72.4 dB
PS-NEXT
(max. at 100MHz)
-32.3 dB -37.1 dB -42.3 dB -69.4 dB
EL-FEXT
(max. at 100MHz)
-23.8 db -23.3 db -30.0 db -54.0 db
PS-ELFEXT
(max. at 100MHz)
-20.8 db -20.3 db -27.0 db -51.0 db
PS-ANEXT
(max. at 500MHz)
-24.2 db -20.0 db
PS-AELFEXT
(max. at 500MHz)
-23.0 db
Return Loss
(max. at 100MHz)
-16.0 db -20.1 db -12.0 db -20.1 db -20.1 db
Delay Skew
(max. at 100m)
45 ns 45 ns 40 ns 25 ns
Networks Supported 100BASE-T 1000BASE-T 1000BASE-TX 10GBASE-T 10GBASE-T +